Originally Posted by Linio
Originally Posted by devdev463

And if this still isn't enough to convince you then I would also like to point to the 94% steam user reviews as well to show that the majority are in fact very satisfied with this game.


I know I'm a little late to the party, and although I'm all for bashing the armor system, although I must admit devedev463 has a point there.

I was wondering : all the people complaining here and there, did you put a thumbs down on Steam or not? Not saying you should do it, I was just wondering... Because, yeah, I never saw one review about this on the Steam pages although, it seems both fair and important for potential buyers to have that type of information. If you're unhappy with the game as it is, why not say it where appropriate?


You are both right. The game is good, could have been great... And I would rate it positively, yet I am still disappointed with the game. But there is a problem with community right now that it does not allow for almost any critique of the game, its the same thing that happend with Witcher 3 on release - game had flaws but people clamied it was the second coming of Jesus. Now they claim that DOS2 is third coming. What is different with DOS2, *in my opinion* is that main features of the game(combat for me)is done worse then in DOS1 while W3 had story and roleplay done very well.

It will take some time before people release flaws of the system. Besides I'm guessing a lot of players are either new to the genre or dont dive into combat mechanics too deep so they dont mind - which is fine ofcourse, not everyone need to be mastermind of tactics in video games. With that being said I thought I would get a 10/10 but I got 7/10 and after 1 playthrough and getting to know the game mechanics pretty well I dont want to play on Tactician mode and in the game overall despite liking the story. And I'm a bit angry with myself becaue I decided to buy DOS2 instead of Warhammer 2 Total War because I thought I will put more hours into it. Oh well...