Originally Posted by NeoAnubis
You just played yourself, that is the issue.

Well no, because my original point is that the point made made no effort to explain itself. Not that it was wrong, but all it presented was hyperbole, number of other points are similar, they aren't well written and don't explain the issue.

I remade a wizard (level 14) so they have roughly 20/20 int and wits. They're looking fine, 30% spell crit seems alright. Opening with potent aoe is strong. Hasn't lost notable damage, don't know how it'll work out in the long run, will find out .

I can see problems with wit / initiative, but they're not as pronounced as the op makes out. Even if wits doesn't work as a main stat, it doesn't have to. You wouldn't put massive points into wisdom, you don't need to put all your points in the damage stat.


gambling on some rng cc affect is not a deep strategic decision. It's just a sign of gambling addiction.