You could say, it's just how you interpret things... I'm just saying, in this case, it is rather your own assumption that failed you.
That being said, you don't want to be so literal in this particular game.
Not true.
I interpret things the way the game 'teaches' me to interpret things. Refer to my OP to see some examples of why "you" or "your" refers ONLY to the caster in 99% of skill descriptions, and not to multiple allies or party. "You" is the character that you are currently controlling, not the party.
Not convinced yet? Here is an example of how the game describes another spell that affects all allies around the caster:
Now THAT is a good description. It's clear, there's no confusion. It's just missing the radius, but that's fine.
Now compare that to Evasive Aura, which also applies an effect to all allies around caster:
If you still don't see the problem, I can't really help you, but that description is garbage.
The issue has nothing to do with whether i'm being too literal, or anything to do with assumptions, it's that the game is not being consistent in its presentation and info.
In fact, the game could use a little more literal explanation of things, instead of super vague and confusing hints.
It's true that certain aspects of the game are best discovered by trial and error, but the game shouldn't mislead deliberately.