were talking OS2 here arent we?
No.
Originally
we were just saying that the first OS's silliness was toned down in OS2, then I said that the first OS does get more "silly" rather than "funny" at times (implying the toning down was a good move), and that I, personally, don't need BG3 to be any more "silly" or "funny" than the original BG games are.
Then you jumped in and assumed someone was "attacking" OS2 for being "silly", and felt that you had to defend it somehow.
That pretty much sums up the last couple posts.
