Again more strawmen. How does "not looking like a game from 20 years ago" equal "must look like D:OS2"? Nobody is saying the game should look like what the original games looked like. The question is why does it look like D:OS?
As for the critics being "silly" or "children," well, lots of Larian sycophants and fanboys here. See how easy it is? Insults can go both ways.
Because DOS was a success and their building off of that success. But don't insult my intelligence by saying this isn't the DnD 5th edition rules.
Larian is capable of making a game that is not a Divinity clone, right?
So, we must hope because we want a Baldur's Gate game.
He who breaks a thing to understand what it is, has left the path of reason.
