They will made it anyway. I have just a problem with the name BG 3 infront of it. Just name it DOS 3 or dunno Sword Coast xyz .
With the name baldurs gate the fans think bout something else than this product.
This post literally makes no sense. Why would they name a Baldur's Gate game, one that resides within the Baldur's Gate universe, with the same lore, anything but Baldur's Gate? How would naming it DOS make any sense?
Should Fallout New Vegas have been titled TES because it used the same engine and assets? Should Mass Effect or Dragon Age be titled the other for using the same engine and assets?
An IP is defined by its lore first and foremost. Gameplay and art is subject to change. Thus far we've seen a Baldur's Gate game with D&D gameplay and content.
People are acting like this is Bethesda bastardizing the Fallout IP based on a small showcase in a very early build with placeholder content. I'm honestly baffled.
