If they were to rename the game (which they wont, and cannot), would you shut up? no.
You wouldnt. youd mvoe the goalpost yet again.
At firs tit was "it was gonna have the divinity ruleset" no it doesnt. then it was "it will have too much humor and wont be grimdark" cue the trailer now its "we dont like the name"
youll never be satisfied. so no cocnessions should be made to you.
And if you people KEEP bringing up this nonsense about "Muh dark atmosphere" ill make a collage of all those brightl ylit BG2 images from the other thread and i will post it EVERY.SINGLE.TIME you bring this up.
Hey sorry for bothering you with my thread.
As I said i really loved DOS1 and wish all the best for that game series.
However, I liked BG1 and BG2 better - better story, better setting, better combat, better spells. BG spell system was so advanced still to this day no game has came close to it.
So YEAH I would love if somebody made a GREAT BG3, but all I saw in the demo was a new DOS game called BG3.
Larian knows this is the truth.
Look what happened to Fallout 4 - the game looks like a circus for kids. Unfortunately it seems that Larian is making the same mistake as Bethesda with Fallout.
Since BG3 is still in development, I'm just making a suggestion - even though the probability that the devs will listen is close to zero.
