Ok you know what, I'll delete and create another topic.
I was nearly sure you'll come again to say it's not what you would read
Like I said, limited in scope. To say "what was not in DOS2 that you would like to see in BG3" is fine, but can open an enormous number of subjects (and is being done in many other threads). To keep it to "what was in DOS2 that should or should not be in BG3" is much more restrained and on point.
btw, I did read your reply in it's entirety
