I really think people forget that no one said "BG3 HAVE to be like BG1 and 2"...
Of course things had changed, and of course RTwP as wa experienced it it way too old school.
Those 46% voting for RTwP are not all saying the gameplay should run the exact same way it did in BG1 and 2 (or in new "oldschool rpg" that use the exact same receipe).
Such as 53% in favor of TB never said it should be like DoS (this is obvious, 1st point is the rules that aren't the same).
But this is not the point of this topic.
I really have the feelings that lots of people here don"t really know WHY BG1 and BG2 are legendary games (nearly everyone agrees to say that, players, press,...).
It's not just about D&D, it's not just about the story, it's not just about general gameplay... It's an addiction of many things you can't understand playing those games now : if you play Baldur's Gate 1 or 2 for the first (or second) time today (or even for the past 10 years I have to admit it...), it just looks like an old game...
I think that's a reason why discussions are so complicated between "hardcore" fans, those who just like it because they always loved D&D and it's one of the biggest adaptations in video games, the new players wathever their experience etc...
Last edited by Maximuuus; 07/03/20 08:01 PM.
