I meant P.K is closer to BG than BG3 I wasn't rating P:K or comparing it to DOS2
Even a racing game can be called BG3 if WoTC really wants to but those games weren't named like that for a reason. They said the story of the first to games was totally closed,and that some people in FR are very long lived so we could see them in BG3. I don't think a couple cameos are a solid link to a story but yes,we don't know about that yet so everything story related are just guesses.
I think the point the other user is making is that the recent games that look and play similar to BG have not done nearly as well as DOS2 with the statistics we have.
That being said, while I think it's important to stress what people would like to see and how they think the game can improve (outside of RTwP since it won't happen), it's important for people to also realize that a lot of what's shown thus far is subject to change.
As I've outlined a few times already, from what we've seen they're currently in pre-alpha and they've even admitted to a lot of things changing (like the UI). Right now they're basically laying down a playable framework which still has a ton of placeholders and unfinished pieces. Even when the game is in early access it will be tough to judge the game by anything other than core gameplay and writing/story until the final release.
Edit: Just pointing out the last two pieces are a general to everyone rather than just you.