id say fury road was not annoying about its politics.
Its characters were flat, becuase its an action movie, but not obnoxiously so.
There was no agency taken away from characters to make a point. Id say the only characters where agency was a quesiton were the women beeing freed.
Taking agency was somewhat of a theme for this movie, which arguably is giving a dumb action film a bit too much credit.
Meanwhile in star wars, agency is taken away from legacy character
TadasGa:
So your issue is with my definition?
Well if the definition beeing based on a vast majority of cases and those examples that do not fit within that beeing "created" in a different way, by which i mean by "acciden" ( i know this implies intent, but lets call it that for simplicity, compared to how reproduction tends to otherwise work in mammels) is not good enaugh a definition for you, then it all boils down to Subjectivism.
In which case its an argument of Ideology and Principle rather than one of science.
You cannot expect an objective answer to a subjective question in that case.
>Massive threats of violence
that seems like a truism. When talking about intersex people, i guess they do get bullied in school, maybe, but kids dont understand nuance and a lot of people get bullied for a lot of reason.
Open violence against those people?
Well i dont know where you live, but certainly not in western or central europe.
maybe if you talk about the middle east or china where the gender of children is a huge deal, sure.
In the western world i think any "issues" therein come from the fact that parents ofthen get asked to make a descision on the sex of the child.
Which then comes to the question: what is medically adviseable versus the wellbeeing of the child.
You obviously cannot know what kind of person a child is going to become, but you can predict medical risks for intervening or not intervening.
In that case, i wouldnt call that open hostility or violence, but a very heavy question on the life of a potential child that can only realy be answered by the parents.
And quite frankly, not a quesiton that theres a definitive answer to, as with many dilemmas.
>Purpose of life
Im not getting into the "Meaning of life".
you are interpreting me wrong.
All meaning is derived from Humans. Flat out. Only a sentient beeing can ascribe meaning to something.
I am not ascribing meaning to life, i am observing what life does.
And from observing life in its various forms one can see what it does. Nameley it tends to propergate information, in some way.
Wether or not theres purpose behind that, is for humans to determine.
but you cannot deny that this is something that all lifeforms , biologically, attempt to acomplish in some fashion.
Of course some humans activeley try to work against that, but thats a conscious descision and quite frankly another topic entierly.
>SRY
again, yes, it appears to be an Enzyme that is integral in the embryonal development. it works together with other factors. What im saying is that yes, theres other factors than chromosomes that help the development of gonads.
Doesnt realy have any impact on the debate on sex.
Unless you want to REALY simplify the debate.
>Memes like there are only two gendes hurt people
do they?
i mean, sure, some intersex people might get hurt. But others might say "yeah duh, but that doesnt mean i dont exist it means that i am literaly, in some fahsion, part of both genders".
Thats what i said, you cannot assume Offense on the behalf of those people.
There might be intersex people who DONT want to be seen as a Third gender because that makes them "other" from other people, rather than including them.
you cannot know this and thus you cannot say that one or the other way of saying it hurts or helps them.
Theres not a lot of em, but theres enaugh that they have different opinions (by which i mean theres more than one)
>Discrimination
im again asking the *where*
im not making a moral argument for China or Saudi Arabia.
But i dont think theres literal lynchmobs going around for intersex people.
as for job discrimination: its hard to pin that down since theres so many factors.
Im pretty sure im at a disadvantage for having a very complicated last name. Im pretty sure that if you mention wanting to have children on Social Media your employment will become more difficult.
>Becoming caucasian
in america maybe.
In europa, well. I can talk about central europe and its culture as lot but due to many migration periods and wars, people tend to differentiate on a lot of factors and looks is only one of them.
By blending i mean blending into public consciousness BY not acting a lot different from the general public.
This might be a tough pill to swallow, but this is not somehting you can argue away. People will extend more leeway and consideration to them they consider to be on their "Team"
