for one i dont care who it gives amunition to.
I think defining sex as beeing two genders gives homophobes (why homophobes anyway? homosexuals kind of stop beeing meaningfull if theres more than two genders) less ammunition than obscene displays at pride parades do.
If gender would be "officially" defined as having more than two sexes, you think this would persuade anyone to change their mind in that case?
As for Poland and its LGBT ideology free zone:
You got it exactly the wrong way around.
This is what im trying to say. Its not that poland is going around shooting gay people there.
Its explicitly against the ideology of normalizing it.
You can disagree with that and say thats bullshit. but this position has widespraed appeal in poland.
So wether you like it or not, youll have to persuade people in poland if you want to get them over to your side.
Persuade is the important word here.
PERSUADE instead of SUBVERT.
Poland is a highly christian country and if you try to subver that from the outside, they will not change.
ive actually had this discussion with a very catholic woman once, who told me that basically, the cahtolic church got pretty far in saying "yeah actually its ok" because aperently, the entire "Homosexuality is bad" part of the bible stems from the belief that there was a limited ammount of sperm in the male body and that it needs to be preserved.
More itnerrestingly, the Bible actually has nothing to say on Lesbianism and is basically not prohibiting it.
Either way. What im saying is, nobody is int he position to force their beliefs on a majority.
Trying to do so will only result in backlash
>Deaht penalty on homosexuality
Well for one i dont know how we came from Intersex people to homosexuality, but right.
So on the deaht penalty.
Theres a certain kind of country that has the deaht penalty for homosexuals. Muslim theocracies or at least very religious muslim countries.
I think theres only 3 muslim majority countries that dont prohibit it (bosnia, malaysia and turkey if i recall correctly)
Im certainly not jumping to the defense of those.
but i dont think that portrayal in Video Games (western devil media) will persuade any of those people to change their stance.
Likewise i dont think that a western definition of Gender would persuade them, since they dont give a shit about what the west has to say anyway.
Good that we agree on the biology thing.
>Discrimination
nother big topic since it happens to a lot of people for a variety of reasons.
Youll never fully get rid of it because how the human brain is rigged.
But you certainly wont get rid of it by forcing things on people.
which gets me to
>Including marginalized groups
It is exactly the opposit way around.
Including them in ludircous ways otherizes them more.
Especialy if their inclusion is, liek ti is in many of the "woke" media is at the detriment of characters representing the majority.
These stories are either supposed to be aimed at the minorities themselves, trying to score points with them, or at the woke bubble that doenst need to be persuaded.
To me, it appears to be invasive, it appears to be disliking the majoity and it seems to not include the minorities, it seems to be activeley holding them to a different standard and showing their otherness.
To give a random example of where the inclusion is done well, id point towards, i know random example, Dr House, cause ive been watching that show as of late.
Theres no tokenism there, no elevation of minority status. Its just there.
Whats also important is, that minorities arent overrepresented. Because that again gives off wrong vibes.
Like those fake commercial friends groups where everyone is some token persona.
Just feels jarring and uncanny.