>That link does nothing to refute the fact that the vast majority of people are male or female, and differences in hormones / development / personality is not relevant to biological sex in this context (already accounted for by saying 'essentially' binary, and strongly bimodal).

Vast majority people fitting into 2 categories is not the same as binary. That's the problem I am adressing. Vast majority of people have brown/blue eyes. It doesn't make eye color binary. Bimodal distribution is not the same as binary, it's spectrum by definition. The problem with looking at sexes as bimodal is that some trait can be one side of spectrum, another - on opposite. Some people don't fit that well on the scale. As almost everything in life - it's complicated.

Development and personality are absolutely relevant in discussing sex differences and again they are not binary. Development doesn't magically stop once you leave the womb. It's not as explicit or obvious as reproductive organs, but brain is absolutely crucial in sex determination. That's why you get trans people. MRI imaging reveals that some parts of their brain are closer to the sex they identify as, not as their genitals. There is some research being done in estrogen receptor pathways: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/02/200205084203.htm

>There have been several countries where 'diversity is our strength'..

I shouldn't have asked and shoudln't have tried to be mildly amusing. It's red herring to the topic we were discussing. You don't offer hard data and I could counter with anecdotes too, but it's not relevant. I have no strong opinions on unconscious bias training. In terms of platforming I believe in responsible platforming - if you decide to platform harmful ideas, you should also present strong opposition (in terms of arguments) to them.

>If saying there are only 2 genders is "ammunition for homophoboes, transphobes etc", that is at least implying one should not claim there are only 2 genders (specifically, biological gender, ie sex).

I am claiming that sex being binary is demonstrabily false and is used by bad faith actors to spew anti lgbtq propaganda.

>suppression of politically incorrect facts.

Could you tell me fact you are referring to? So far I have seen that some canada/some platfroms have decided that being dick to trans people is violation of their rights. For youtube - it has generally trended towards more adverstisment friendly content, all kinds of speech is being demonatised on both sides of political spectrum. Also on canada:

"But experts say just using an incorrect pronoun isn't enough to qualify as criminal hate speech. "Absolutely not a chance," says University of Toronto law professor Brenda Cossman. "There is no criminalization of the misuse of pronouns."

Richard Moon, a University of Windsor professor who studies freedom of speech issues, says only speech that is "extreme in character" would qualify as criminal. He says the person uttering the words must be found to have "willfully promoted hatred."

>I don't think you know what a strawman argument is.

You quoted me and then said: "They are not part of the team if they are perfect, can do no wrong, and if you don't like them, or the media in question, it can only be because you are a bigot. I think that was kind of the point of asking for overt politics not to be inserted into the game." I have never claimed anything like that. By wiki definition: "A straw man (or strawman) is a form of argument and an informal fallacy based on giving the impression of refuting an opponent's argument, while actually refuting an argument that was not presented by that opponent". I think it fits.