>I won't get into gendered topics, but it's suggested that the 1.7% encompasses a multitude of genetic and birth abnormalities and not actually intersex itself.
Sure, it just goes to show that either definition relies on arbitrary cut off points and how do you want to compartmentalize the spectrum. For example is XXY male or intersex or it's own thing? Is XY who has external female genitalia and sees herself as a woman is a male or a female or w/e? Depends on definitions. My bigger point still stands - sex is not binary.
Last edited by TadasGa; 01/04/20 10:17 AM.
