>Democrats were in favor of both open borders and free trade
Could you give me source? What exactly are you talking about? The more emotional you get the less coherent your arguments become. Ignoring whataboutism I am very much in favor of world wide denuclearization.
I won't respond to your gish galop of sex issues. But for this argument:
>Abortion is a pathological occurrence in society that traumatizes people
https://www.ansirh.org/sites/default/files/publications/files/turnaway_study_brief_web.pdfIt's not based in reality, it mostly comes from false religious beliefs.
Bill Clinton (D) signed NAFTA in 1993. As far as open borders, cf.
https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/illegal-immigration-democrats-open-borders/ (it's not even a recent article). Denuclearization is never going to happen - nuclear weapons are a very powerful deterrent against your rivals and potential invaders, it's why countries like Iran and N. Korea want them. It's not really whataboutism - Iran is by no means a warmongering country with imperial capacities but a regional power and poses a much lesser threat to world peace than the US.
Regarding abortion:
https://afterabortion.org/abortion-...-abortion-dangers-abortion-side-effects/Also, if there were no need for abortions in society healthcare would be able to focus its efforts on other life-threatening medical conditions. Obviously refusing women access to abortion has a negative impact as per your source, but I don't see how you can consider it a normal / harmless thing.
Since people are getting tired of this debate, I think it's fair to call it even now. PM me if you're interested in further conversation.
