>Five years ago, open boarders was supposedly a right wing proposal to get cheap labour.
Right, being against open borders or a literal wall are mutually exclusive positions. Got it.
>Claiming walls are racist doesn't do much to deal with criminals entering the country illegally, human trafficking, people entering without medical screening who may or may not be sick, and may not be vaccinated, affecting herd immunity for various diseases in certain locations, etc.
Building a literal wall doesn't really address these issues either, it's just a symbolic act. A meme if you will. A meme that costs billions of dollars. If you want to combat those issues there are better ways to spend those billions of dollars.
>Was I referring to the fact that the t-shirts existed, or who was wearing them and how they were being promoted?
Ok, I am really not following you. How does this t-shirt support claim that "inserting feminist politics into the films was part of the problem, at least."? I am 99% sure that for dysney money >> politics. Whatever sells. I am pretty sure that their decision to include minorities or plot points have more to do with toys and to whom they can sell, than any political ideology.
>Do you actually doubt that overtly pushing a particular ideology can result in character and plot designs that are not to the betterment of the story?
Your initial claim was much stronger - " therefore generally write poorly." "Can" is an easy give. On the other hand "Parasite" won too many awards to mention, including oscar for best movie and it's highly ideologically driven, so is latest Joker etc etc.
