In order for something to be eligible for fitting the 'strawman argument' definition, they'd need to take a quote of yours out of context to misrepresent it in a way that suits your counterargument while not representing what they actually meant with its context in its entirety. So unless Gt27mustang quoted someone's argument and twisted it to mean something else, I'm not sure that allegation is very accurate.
Play nice though, we're all here to discuss opinions on a thread, not to actively try to dismiss or invalidate other opinions just because they differ from our own.
