All we've seen are a few seconds from a few scenes being developed, scenes that were put into the context of a story about a group of people who wouldn't normally associate with one another asking themselves if their common experiences have caused them to forge common bonds. I was kinda impressed by the author they interviewed. I saw some wine glasses being clanked and some facial expressions that made me giggle.
Like all the "we the we have a pretty good idea" statements I don't think we have enough info -- we will on the 6th.
But, with what we do have, I agree with @LoneSky when I compare the (lack) of reaction to the (much longer) pulling the-brain-out-of-the-skull scene and the negative reactions to some story boards. I'm reminded of the horror / erotica double standard. If an exposed breast gets a knife through it, that earns the movie a R rating / if an exposed breast is gently stroked the movie gets an NC17. Will no one think of the children?!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motion_Picture_Association_film_rating_systemNo, you still aren’t getting it.
The horror / erotica double standard comes from a conception that depicting violence is more morally permissible than depicting nudity or sexuality.
That isn’t what has been stated in this thread.
People by and large haven’t been saying that don’t like the sex scenes because it is morally wrong. People’s dissatisfaction is that sex scenes between video characters often looks dumb, going off the deep edge into the uncanny valley.
It’s not:
violence = okay
sex = bad
It’s:
Animated sex with video game characters doesn’t look good.
