Originally Posted by Gothfather
Originally Posted by WarBaby2
Originally Posted by Kurzzi
I'm not sure what class your main character was, but mine was a pathetic wizard who stupidly thought I might get away with picking more situational cantrips so when I went up against 3 intellect devourers with just a wizard on low ground and a trickery cleric it took me a couple of tries to get lucky and not have my shit pushed in, so I had the alternative situation in feeling like CR was skewed in such a way that it generally screwed me over, and when I got to the underdark the minotaurs and dwarves forced me to swap out gale who I liked more, because wizards were just not effective enough in combat to even begin to handle shit that really shoulda been higher than "level 4" according to CR


Drow ranger - one shot, one kill per round from a hidden position on the ledge... they didn't even reach Shadowheart, who was standing on the ground floor as bait. Still, they each took about 10-15 or so damage to take down and awarded 10XP. Hardly a CR7 creature.

Originally Posted by Demoulius
Dont know where you are getting your info from but an intellect devourer is most defenitly NOT a CR7 challenge. A quick google search gave me this: https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Intellect_devourer

Which shows a CR of 2. And the monster isent using its abilites. Which can be explained by the presence of the tadpols. Maybe they are just trying to disable us rather then kill us to prevent us from getting away.


From the official 5e SRD... but I could get my books real quick, if you prefer. wink
https://www.5esrd.com/gamemastering...type/aberrations/intellect-devourer-3pp/


Yeah you should look in your book because in the MM it is CR2.

You are so dead set in see in this game as an unfaithful sequel that you automatically see everything in the worse light and you WILL switch your position to maintain your belief that this game is not "really" BG3. So much so that when shown your position is wrong instead of going to the source you'd rather take some non official source because it agrees with you.


He/she admitted that they made an error roughly 15 minutes before you replied tho?