Dude. She seems super well written to me. She is a cleric of shar, and thus she likes it when you exhibit behaviors that fit the portfolio of her deity like deceiving others. She also hates giving up secrets, even tho she won't risk the superb benefit of traveling with a group that does not want to kill her and might help her with a certain parasite problem. She even hates it when you tell her "you can trust me" because that makes you seem like a gullible moron in her eyes. She would find the situation she finds herself in very uncomfortable which is portrayed super well. If you manage to befriend her somewhat she makes more and more sense, and if you role play something close to her she makes perfect sense, even the power hunger.
I think all the EA companions are really well written, and once you figure out WHO THEY ARE they make perfect sense. They could use some tuning OF COURSE, but for EA they seem super proimising.
I think people find issue with the companions due to the fact that they act their personalities, and thus do not always think like the player does. It's like in real life when people shun or belittle others because their ideas don't match their own - they are obviously just "pricks" or "uneducated" or something along those lines. In this case it's "poorly written". Yes they seem immoral to a "good" player, but they do not to an "evil" player.
Last edited by Skarpharald; 10/10/20 08:01 PM.
