Precisely.
I am a big D&D fan and I also love the BG series. D:OS not so much. But I am really happy with the game. I like the way that they implemented the D&D5e ruleset, particularly being turn-based (a departure from BG). I don't mind a few tweaks since the original D&D rules do support some homebrewing. However, I do agree that the D:OS influence could be toned down a little bit.
As for the OP: just no. I want a proper D&D implementation with TB combat, not RtwP.
I wasn't being completely serious with the above, though I must say I actually share some "BG fan" sentiment. Wouldn't say I'm unhappy per se, rather somewhat worried about BG identity being lost in the argument of "D:OS vs D&D".
And RTwP for me.
I don't expect it, but it would be amazing in a Definitive Edition or the like.
I get D&D fans being unhappy, I get BG fans being unhappy. But this part confuses me the most I'd say.
Divinity fans are unhappy about D&D aspects in a... D&D game? This seems to be the most confusing thing here.
I agree it's confusing, but this is what I've seen on the forum. I guess it's because the playerbase largely recruits from Divinity fans, so they'll naturally compare BG3 to Larian's previous games, particularly OS1/2.
