Originally Posted by UnderworldHades
Originally Posted by Milkfred
I think Nettie's a fine encounter, but a lot of people use it as an example of a bad one. The question is why they do and why they don't feel it works.


For me its terrible bc you're making multiple checks for ONE thing. I persuaded once, why do I need to do it again and again for a single thing? Just make the first ones DC higher like a sane DM would.

You do multiple persuasion checks when the goal changes. Like for gold. You persuaded once to instead get 300 gold but you ask for even more so you roll again with higher DC.

But the way Nettie is you roll multiple times for one thing, making you feel shitty for succeeding and even punishing you. Just make the first roll a higher DC and that's it. Simple.


Which speaks of what? A fundamental lack of understanding in how the 5e rules are meant to be applied... leading into the conclusion that: No, the ruleset isn't the problem, the mishandled application of it is.

Last edited by WarBaby2; 11/10/20 11:25 PM.