Originally Posted by Ascorius
Originally Posted by mr_planescapist
Many people find that Pathfinder:kingmaker to be the closest thing to table top D&D like gameplay in a video game, and love it for that.
I find the game very slow, mathematical, drowned with stats, difficult and definetly not fun. Perfectionist and simulation/numbers freaks llove these kind of games.
I really hope BG3 does not become that. Anything closer to DOS2 is great in my book. Larian almost has it...the game needs that extra spicy fun bit that pulls away from the all mighty D&D set in stone commandments.
Anything just slightly differing from 5e rules and you will have all these perfectionist just complaining to no end.


A game from the most famous and celebrated D&D franchise, and also heavily advertised as a 5E product. But yeah, you are right, lets get away from this boring D&D stuff ...


I find it ironic that you are basically telling fans of BG and 5e to go play another game when the name of the game is BG3.




This.

Like the issue is that there are too many Divinity rules and crap that is ruining the balance of 5e. 5e should be the main thing, and 5e rules should rule the game, not Divinity. If you want a DOS game go play OS2/1, instead of going like "Oh i know they keep saying this is supposed to be a faithful adaptation of 5e but nah, lets go back to DOS rules". No, Larian needs to stick to 5e rules and do them correctly, this is BG3, and a 5e DnD game.