The premise was that effort should be factored in and we both agreed to discard it because that in itself is a distraction, so kindly fuck off, and focus on Sharp.
If you want to have a private conversation, a forum seems like the wrong venue for it.
Accusing someone of moving the goalposts around a point you "mutually discarded" before launching into several sentences about that very point is funny, and nobody would feel bad for laughing about it.
It's pretty obvious that the entire follow up highlights why accepting the premise would be a bad idea. Now was my method of going about it the best way? Most likely not since I did commit a string of fallacies.
I also misspoke and should have said that Stabbey decided not to follow up on that point and I did not further add to the pile of whataboutisms, I think we can all agree that we dropped it. As should you.
Stay on the subject at hand, your energies should be focused on educating Sharp or enlightening us why 5e must be strictly adhered to in order to produce a better product rather than iterating towards the audience.
So, I say to you kindly, fuck off. Pretty please. <3
