Linking Agile development framework in a discussion about Early Access games is a really weird thing to do. It's not technically irrelevant, but I think it misses on context in a way that nobody who actually works in or adjacent to software engineering would.
The guy stated he knew what was up.
I agree, I just don't think the article was a very good way for you to illustrate your point.
I can concede to that, but also I didn't have the post mortem for Hades readily available.
Just as an aside, this has nothing to do with logic. It's not a valid or sound argument even if I generate the necessary premises.
EX: An unwritten premise necessary to create an inescapable condition for the conclusion (that which renders an argument sound) would have to be "software cannot be changed after launch," otherwise the simple counter-point that a game can be patched after launch would expose the unsoundness of the argument. Such a premise is also obviously invalid - to speak of the logical definition.
You're not going to let me be lazy are you? I'll concede to that. But can you seriously get back to the other thread? Like I genuinely want to resolution to that debate. Pretty please?
Look, I am not even being aggressive, I am being nice. Extra nice.
