So.
I've been reminded by the forum here and on Steam that the based on a big enough population, and given a standard curve, once you calculate the standard deviations... 90% of people on the internet or stupid trash monsters.
As a consequence stupid flame threads, threads that aren't suggestions at all, and things that have been addressed 50x already immediately wash out any useful feedback.
We're not actually giving feedback are we?
I will see a review posted by an adult, it's concise, has a few valid suggestions, and it's always gone in 10 seconds. Which makes sense because if everyone agrees with the post there's no reason to comment. Yet, it is replaced by some people arguing about totally intangible things, like the 'soul' of the game.
I just cant imagine anyone is actually reviewing the real feedback hidden under 100's of threads about Elves having the wrong accent or whatever.
I look at videogames mostly from psychological perspectives, satisfying gameplay loops, intuitive interface, completeness and utility of systems implemented. Are the people who do being heard? Or are these feedback forums just something to let people who bought the game in early access blow off steam?