Originally Posted by clavis
Originally Posted by biomag

[quote=clavis]

.


thats the crux of it all. doing things to make it your own, while keeping people interested, and keeping it balanced.

Wanting to people to see they are being baised in their views, so they actually give real feedback and not. Well it's not 9% 18% 599% D&D so it's not D&D when in fact it still is, just under different management. Without the real feedback nothings going to change, and by putting for instance 95% D&D as an arguement when official things invalidate your arguement to me is just stupid. Serves no point other then make people think your a fanboy, or die hard, narrow minded, ignorant, arrogant, etc. which simply degrades the point of Feedback, and Suggestion.



I would simply argue that this is already happening in the individual threads. People are offering explanations beyond 'its not 5e', so no point in pulling all those into a discussion about what the general expectation is smile

Maybe not everybody takes the time to go into detail, but I think its fair also to say 'If you change something, then its on you to sell it to me, especially when its broken and not to me to do the carry the burden of pointing out all the things why its broken'. So while I agree its not the best feedback, I still understand the frustration from people in those cases.