Originally Posted by Ben Thunder
So when an angry druid accidentally lets her viper nibble on some thiefling kid, that's where you draw the line, but the whole part with the mindflayer ship where they sedate and dissect humanoid species, feed on their brains and twist them to become thralls or make them morph into ghaik themselves, that part you shrugged off no problem?


Originally Posted by Postwave

Pretty much yeah. That first part is the setup.

In a tabletop D&D game, if a DM did that to us without explaining out of game, it'd be annoying, and maybe enough to make me not keep with that game. But, if that's the whole premise of the campaign and I know it to start, it'd be fine. Like I said, just the setup. You can then make your character ideas around that. Real D&D is about giving the players agency. Computerized RPGs should at least present the illusion.


Well said!

I agree that the battles between "adults" and "monsters" are pretty tolerable... but putting kids in danger is not.

I'm going glacially slowly, so I don't know if there is any ultimate fate intended for the jerk-of-an-Archdruid, but I AM going to kill her. With poison if I can manage it, just because Karma.