But this is in itself as question about the nature of morality -- do we judge moral actions by intent or outcome? I've always thought of D&D as intent based -- Silvanus might agree with a consequentialist pov but Lathander wouldn't.
Reactive / contextual morality fits pretty neatly into "neutral" territory and should have implications. If you want to wield a holy sword you should have to give up other choices (like taking the ability score buff from the hag)
