Originally Posted by RumRunner151
blindhamster's post is way more detailed than I have the patience to produce. I agree with at least 75% of the details and the bottom line. The two games are apples and oranges. Yeah they're both fruit (DnD 5e), but way different in scope style, etc. Could they borrow from each other and both be better? Maybe. But to compare the two is can only come down to subjective taste.

Not actually, they are more like two kinds of apple.
There is nothing subjective about about better combat being a good thing. Solasta adresses most of the negative feedback about BG3's combat.