Originally Posted by Tzelanit
Originally Posted by Ormgaard
It's basicly Monty hall right now, game feels arcademinded i doubt many P&P gamers would play a module or enjoy a GM like this.


Whew, good thing that we're playing a video game and not a literal 1:1 interpretation of a tabletop session then.



Damn, bad thing Larian advertised the game as a 5e d&d game then.

Also. Whenever we ask the game to follow the traditional rule set a bit more closely, we get counterarguments like "1:1". That is not what we are asking for. But you can't take away Larians own marketing strategy of the game, hyping the game for people that loves the 5e rule set and then expect us to shut up and be happy with what we get. At least not during an EA.
We understand that this is Larians interpretation. We understand that some changes will be made, either because of technical limitations or because it's what Larian envisioned. And we understand that several things that we ask for, won't even get considered. But we don't know which of those it will be. So we ask. we request. we make wishes. Just like people that wants to see less d&d in bg3 do. And coming with the argument it's a videogame. That is, in my opinion, quite weak.

Last edited by PrivateRaccoon; 27/10/20 02:55 PM.