Dehonator
it's not cool to reduce my explanation with a "BG3 should have RTwP because it's BG" because it's clearly a way to reduce my thinking into a stubborn and undevelopped idea.
As I already said... it's, from my point of view, important to respect the game you're call yourself for.

You talked about Fallout 3 or FF.
How many gamers liked Falout 1 and 2 and actually liked Fallout 3 ? Same for FF even if it's a particular case for a lot of reasons.

The point is, yeah, as I said, Larian can do an amazing game, they could do a FPS-RTS-puzzle-candy-crush BG3 and it could be amazing and revolutionary and be selled at 300 millions copies.
It would still be kind of a treason for the BG-serie.

So yeah, BG3 should have RTwP because it's BG. But I have to say this sentence makes sense only if you have a bit of respect and consideration for the gamers you work for.

So, keep talking about the amazing TB, keep talking about evolving.
The point is BG was a RTwP game, doing otherwise is a bit of a treason.
I'm not against evolution, I'm not against TB. I'm against the true promess.

BG3, for now, isn't BG3, it's "Tadpole fucked my brain : an adventure in Faerun"

And you know what, I know I would really prefer this game than BG3. Because buying it, playing it, I wouldn't have any particular expectations. because it would be a whole new game, no one would have make me promises.

So yeah, if BG3 doesn't get RTwP, I will survive, I may even play it and enjoy it but in my mind, and in the mind of a lot of gamers who hoped for so long for a BG3, it won't be BG3. It will be "Illithids is the new pandemic in Faerun".




PS:
BG was playable in a kind of TB.

Last edited by Zefhyr; 27/10/20 06:37 PM.