Question 1: Do you feel that granting creatures advantage if they attack from high ground is to powerfull?
Question 2: Would you prefer if the advantage gets replaced with a flat bonus to hit?
Question 3: Do you feel that the disadvantage penalty for attacking someone on high ground needs to be removed?
Question 4: Would you be ok with high ground granting cover to people in place of it granting the attacker disadvantage?
Question 5: Would you prefer if the bonus and penalties for high ground get removed alltogether?
Question 6: Would you prefer the heigh ground 'issue' be resolved in a different manner? If yes, please explain in your post how you would like to see it solved.
1. Yes
2. Neither, remove it. A character on high ground already has a lot of advantage just by leveraging line of sight.
3. Yes
4. No. Have Larian actually implement cover like they should have in the first place.
5. Yes
6. Yes. Follow 5e ruleset. A character on high ground can already peek, shoot and go back to not be in line of sight. This is already an incredible advantage. At most, I could see that a character on high ground can have a longer reach, but that's it.
