Question 1: Do you feel that granting creatures advantage if they attack from high ground is to powerful? Yes
Question 2: Would you prefer if the advantage gets replaced with a flat bonus to hit? No
Question 3: Do you feel that the disadvantage penalty for attacking someone on high ground needs to be removed? Yes
Question 4: Would you be ok with high ground granting cover to people in place of it granting the attacker disadvantage? Yes
Question 5: Would you prefer if the bonus and penalties for high ground get removed altogether? No
Question 6: Would you prefer the high ground 'issue' be resolved in a different manner? If yes, please explain in your post how you would like to see it solved.
- Related to question 4, I'd prefer they use the cover system that exists in 5e, and remove Advantage/Disadvantage (and Too High from spells) as it exists. Not a fan of this current iteration. While I answered No to question 2, I would still prefer they only offer like a +2 to hit for height instead of advantage, so that would be preferred but still not desired.
