I mean I don't really care for random reviews, but how do you even have the guts to call those reviews "bad" when the reviews themselves are saying otherwise?
IGN gives a 7, which is "good" on their scale. "Good" is *not* a bad review, you know?
https://corp.ign.com/review-practices/Playing a Good game is time well spent. Could it be better? Absolutely. Maybe it lacks ambition, is too repetitive, has a few technical bumps in the road, or is too repetitive, but we came away from it happy nonetheless. We think you will, too.
Gamespot's 6 is a "fair". And the article reflects that the final product seems to have much more potential and that the EA is not the end of all things for BG3.
So it seems you did not even invest the time to check the reviews you base this thread on.
