GGG when they state that barely anyone makes it beyond Kitava or even reaches maps.
What is the problem???
Everyone seems to having fun. That is the point of any hobby. Fun and engagement. Not complete most content in less time.
MrLlamaSC criticized a lot of things on PoE and ... Din't received the hate. Maybe cuz he is part of the audience judging the game according to his proposal.
cover a game for the general population not for a niche crowd.
Again, what is a niche for you???
ArmA 3 has way more active users on steam than all CoDs combined.
Even if this RPG's are ""niche"" games, WHY THEY SHOULD'T BE RATED according to his proposal?
WHY EVERY SINGLE GAME NEEDS TO APPEAL TO BRAINLETS? You don't see food critiques complaining "no meat" in a vegan restaurant cuz is a retarded complain. Nor pick the most dangerous track on ski on Bariloche and give 0/10 cuz "it is too hard for those who don't wanna invest a lot of time and money into skiing". It is a nonsensical complain.
Just like "i can't hit an insect swarm with an axe" is a retarded complain. Can be a valid reason to the guy who just wanna a mindless fun, not play, but this RPG's elements is why people from the target audience of the game loves it. Why food, sports, etc;
are reviewed according to the proposal and games, are reviewed according to the demands of brainlets, even when the point of the game is to please people who like old school style and nobody is supplying that demand??
The game journalists threats games like Grimoire as a sin only cuz they don't like. The Dark Sun reviweres 90s reviewers that I've posted, rated the game and criticized as the average SSI fan will see it.
PoE only appears near the top when a new season releases and then drops after two weeks
Still far above most AAA "press A for awesome" games. Inlcuding Bugsoft games.
Then you dilute the value of your rating system. Give Among Us 0 because you only review RPGs?
Nope. I should try to see what the target audience of among us likes, what dislikes, play and put myself under the skin of then and then, try to see what the target audience of the game will probably like and probably dislike.
The entire campaign is a waste of time and the entire end game is more or less a grind just to see if your build works which is what the IGN reviewer hinted at.
He was using the basic attack on late stages. This game is not for him.
? It means maybe an hour or two per day if you're lucky.
Then, according to your definition, when I was employed and studding, I was a casual cuz even on weekends, I could't play much. On a period of six months, I had gym, college and a job. Din't had even 1 hour to play per day. Took about 6 months to finish my might & magic run but I enjoyed each second of it.
casual player is and you're severely overestimating what the average person can do without hours of video game experience to aid them.
Nope. Completely wrong.
You not only subestime the average player, but also subestime the average RPG player and believe that all RPG's should appeal to the lowest common denominator brainlet. That logic applied to any other hobby would mean that every complex track on skiing should receive poor ratting, that every firing range should only have close quarters stationary targets, every marathon should be based on the shortest and easiest marathon and so on.
Ahhh and climbing too. Lets rate 0/10 the Mt Everest cuz he is too hard and dangerous to climb. We don't need to write a climbing review to the average climbing enthusiast who likes climbing. We need to appeal to the lowest common denominator. /sarcasm
