Originally Posted by virion
Originally Posted by Abits
if the game can't explain it sufficiently without forcing me to look for outside sources it shouldn't be in it.


Yeah I kinda agree with that. But it's always a problem with games /films taking place in a vaste lore like this. Not too look too far- > Witcher. Many people found the fixation of gerald about yennefer's scent super cringe and silly. When in fact the existence of that aspect of Yen has a really tragic background to it. A background you discover only if you read the books. Or watch the new series ^^

So kinda the same shit here. Why did she help us? Only people familiar with D&D know.

Yeah okay, I'll bite. Perhaps people found it a bit silly, but it is hardly an important world setting detail. I would say the witcher games did a much better job at establishing the world and stand on their own than Baldur's Gate ever did. it's not really a fair comparison because it's been 20 years and even BioWare improved immensely on that aspect of their games since BG.


Larian's Biggest Oversight, what to do about it, and My personal review of BG3 EA
"74.85% of you stood with the Tieflings, and 25.15% of you sided with Minthara. Good outweighs evil, it seems."