I don't understand why this discussion has to turn into another "6 party members yes or no?". @KillerRabbit I think the fact of the matter is that no matter how right you are on the matter, the fact that people are still arguing with you (and it doesn't matter who's right) means there is no agreement on it even in this bastion of D&D and BG forum.
I mean... is there anything that there IS agreement on? These forums or not? You'll even find the rare surface enthusiast.
well, that's my point. check the previews page for a more detailed comment.
Yeah, I've read it and to an extent I agree (I must thank you for restoring a bit of my faith in Larian), but I don't think "you can't please anyone" should be an excuse to not at least consider various criticisms. Perhaps this is not what Swen (or you) intended to say, but it does sound like a possible implication.
I also think most people realise there is no consensus. But since this forum is mostly feedback- and suggestion-oriented, that's what we provide. Each of us has an idea of what the game needs, and of course these ideas will often clash. But I believe a lot of good things can come out from these discussions and debates, even if no "consensus" is ever reached. In the end, this is not a democracy and Larian will do as Larian pleases. But what we can do is provide food for Larian's thought.
