Tuco is right, Sharp and few others have basically tripped themselves into arguing about a strawman they imagined - about Tucos "expertise" - because it seems like an easy hanging fruit to pick. All the while they claim that strawmaned interpretation of "Tucos expertise" is not important and each suggestion and idea should be considered on their own merit - which they fail to do and instead argue about a strawmaned importance of "expertise".
Which Tuco repeatedly explained isnt the case at all, as he was only referring to familiarity, experience with and general knowledge about this kind of systems and games. But the imagined low hanging fruit of criticizing "expertise" in a vacuum - twisted into a strawman argument - is just too satisfying to let go.
Also, the general consensus on anything here does not matter at all. Its not a requirement or a threshold that guarantees the studio will implement anything. False self victimization and "crying on forums" and throwing "hissy fits" is a much surer bet. Development of DoS2 is a glaring proof of that. Remains to be seen if the studio will fall for that again and how much.
The notion of consensus on its own is meaningless, since you can theoretically get some kind of consensus the game should be turned into a fist person shooter. You just need enough of bot accounts, or similar nonsensical "online mob" petitions.
What the devs should do is consider what is better for the game and leverage that against realistic business possibilities.
