Calm down. First of all by your definition of aggregate everything outside of a single dev making a game for himself/herself can be dismissed or misrepresented.
Like I said, you have no understanding of what I am writing and are deliberately misrepresenting me that or you have a complete lack of understanding of basic logic. I stated that any truths derived from something is qualified by that something.
So, by my logic, any truths Larian would come across is first and foremost only applicable to their context and application to any other game or dev would need further qualification and quantification (if applicable). The same goes for people discussing this, and that any truths we arrive to will have to deal with the same scrutiny. Holy shit, not that hard is it?
Your use of aggregate is disingenuous and a smokescreen
This is rich coming from someone who doesn't understand the basic premise of my argument.
Secondly their is always a good point because their is always a goal.
It's almost as if you vaguely have enough comprehension of my argument, but miss the entire point. You're saying here that any good point has a goal. Assigning a GOAL to something inherently makes it biased and the truth of that point or rather the validity lies with that goal. Which is literally what I wrote to begin with, however, if you look at your original post you suggest and imply that it is a truth easily transferrable because all truths are the same.
Having value itself does not negate the existence of a point.
No one ever said that. Like I said, you fail to comprehend the basics of what I wrote even when I provided examples. I also never talked about a single 'point' but rather when you qualify something by amending it with 'good' which is also a value judgment.
Here's a link for you in case you have no idea what the terminology I am using means:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Value_judgment
Thirdly you say your logic is not hiveminded but then immediately use a hiveminded example with the subject of architecture.
Like I said, you have zero understanding of what's being written; you're considering whatever logic the fan boys of Larian have to a system of analysis derived from no one particularly entity or group of entities. Cool. Then I guess it must be difficult to run tests because all the parameters and variables are hiveminded. Awesome job there with that stretch of logic.
It's good that you're going to drop this because you aren't a serious contender for any discussion and brings me back to another point of mine: most feedback here is absolute garbage when it comes to depth but is great for breadth.
