You're trying to do Larian's job for some reason. Just focus on discussing features as you see fit for yourself. That's what others do.
Lol, really?
Asking people to be objective or to think about the problem that's causing them so much discomfort is suddenly Larian's job. You're ridiculous.
Originally Posted by virion
If you try to analyze a feature based on audience as a user then I really don't see what you're trying to achieve.
Then you don't really deserve to work in any field remotely touching a product in any way shape or form right?
You do realize that Larian also plays their own game right? And that other devs play other games right and often go through the same process of thinking?
You know devs that aren't related to video games, such as myself, use a product (like a certain HR/Payroll app) while also having to analyze it from an audience perspective right (hint: it's part of your fucking job)?
So, when you read what I wrote, nowhere did you think that after having achieved what I have asked that there is any gain? No new refinements in arguments, no perspectives, no new questions can be gained?
Like you don't think after applying any argument to these rigors they'll come out stronger or at least have a path to be stronger or have more clarity?
So, you simply prefer people to say "5e is perfectly balanced, we should use this" with no context? Amazing.
