....Yes its not realistic to have all companions be pansexual but...
On the flipside, it's just not realistic....But some people don't give a shit about realism in this regard...
I much prefer the slightly credulity-straining conceit...
What's going on here guys? It sounds worryingly like settling
I'm not going to take this as a worthy compromise, expect better story-telling and they'll give it to you.
Sure, ideally for at least a few of the characters their sexuality should be part of their backstory....For example, if I romance Gale as a man I get slightly different interactions than I do as a woman, ... However, this is a fair amount of extra work for Larian with a minimal return
Don't settle for less on me Warlocke, it's only as minimal as you want it to be.
If they even did this little thing a lot of my criticism of the herosexual relationship would be stymied but so far not even the bare minimum seems to be apparent.
