Originally Posted by Eldath
Originally Posted by DanteYoda
Originally Posted by Eldath
Originally Posted by DanteYoda

I actually want Gnomes, Halflings and Dwarves.. i have no interest in edgy drows and githyanki..



I agree on dwarves and halflings, but if gnomes were deleted from the D&D universe, that would frankly bet a net benefit to all of us.

You realise Halflings are smaller than Gnomes in D&D.
That said whats the hate on Gnomes that can't be added to Halflings?


It has nothing to do with height, it has everything to do with being a forced "look how cute and funny I am" race.
Truly, I would sooner exterminate gnomes then tieflings, and I really hate tieflings.

I dunno what type of Gnomes you play but halflings fit that description way more.. Halflings are way more cutsey.

Originally Posted by BuckettMonkey
Originally Posted by DanteYoda

If anything is not people its Teiflings.. They are kind of an organic construct.. made by devils.

And in what edition are tieflings described as "organic construct made by devils"?
Personally, I don’t remember the fifth, third, second or even fourth edition described them like that.

Well their whole race is by product of devil deals and pacts, how are they made not by sex originally..

Tieflings were usually descended from fiends but not the same as half-fiends, since a Tiefling's fiendish ancestry lies further up the family tree. This description remained true in 3rd Edition. In 4th Edition Dungeons & Dragons, tieflings are a race whose human ancestors made a bargain with devils to increase their power.

They are made like a construct.