well toxic masculinity is not a word id use in general because its unneccesarily polarizing.
Id say wyll is certainly not a very manly character in the sense of maturity and positive masculine qualities.
doesnt mean hes not probably the nicest of the companions, but id say agreeability is not a good judgement about those qualities.
and oh man >The scientific consent had rebuked this kind of regressive attitude about gender and gendered behavior decades ago. prove it then, outstanding claims require outstanding evidence.
The fact that theres critics of an academic field doesnt mean that the field is somehow invalid or that its findings can be discounted out of hand. In what field do you have any credability? Do you need a physcis major to discribe that things fall when you drop them? What kind of silly reductionist argument is that.
>Sordak: I was basically referring to your posts with my comments and you proof me right. Nice kafkatrap. clearly my protest of your characterization proves your characterization right.
I encourage you to read this forum then. also id like to ask, which romance in the series do you prefer then? is any of them good? Are they all horrible? Im genuinly interrested now.
For what its worth, the two of you sound like ideologues to me. You dismiss academic fields out of moral considerations and call beloved staples of the franchise awfull. Well then, you are entitled to your opinion, but somehow i dont think youre making anyone reconsider their position this way.
