Toxic masculinity is not a feminist "creation". You cannot shoot the messenger cause they bring bad news. I have studied feminist theory (though it is not my field) and they make extremely important points and exciting discoveries.
I am a literary scholar and not a biologist but frankly the term "Evolutionary Psychology" screams pseudo-science to me.
Ahahahaha, oh my God, I'm falling off my chair. Feminist theory is legit, but oh no, evolutionary biology is a pseudo-science. Also calling masculinity toxic is toxic. There is nothing toxic about traditional masculinity, and men don't owe conformity to people who resent and hate them. If you find this troubling, good. You should feel troubled, as all petty tyrants should
Originally Posted by Bruh
Originally Posted by spacehamster95
Toxic masculinity is not a feminist "creation". You cannot shoot the messenger cause they bring bad news. I have studied feminist theory (though it is not my field) and they make extremely important points and exciting discoveries.
I am a literary scholar and not a biologist but frankly the term "Evolutionary Psychology" screams pseudo-science to me.
Ahahahaha, oh my God, I'm falling off my chair. Feminist theory is legit, but oh no, evolutionary biology is a pseudo-science. Also calling masculinity toxic is toxic. There is nothing toxic about traditional masculinity, and men don't owe conformity to people who resent and hate them. If you find this troubling, good. You should feel troubled, as all petty tyrants should
Dude, please read through the discussion.
Originally Posted by Bruh
Originally Posted by spacehamster95
Originally Posted by Sordak
slip up on the second one. google it, Evoltuionary psychology is a real thing and just because you never heard of it doesnt mean its not real. Wait till you hear about game theory, then youll start to think the world has gone mad. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolutionary_psychology There, in case you somehow believe that this is something that only exists on youtube or the like.
Yes, I know the discipline exists, but I am also pretty sure it does not mean what you think it does. I meant pseudo-science in that sense, that you are evoking a field of study to support your argument without any credibility on that field. Sorry, mate.
The scientific consent had rebuked this kind of regressive attitude about gender and gendered behavior decades ago.
Dude you already admitted never studying evo-psych, so you might as well stop making uneducated comments about it's validity. You just don't like it because it disagrees with you, therefore you try to assassinate it's validity so that you can feel comfortable.
Yes, I have never studied it, just like Sordak. The difference, I won't name drop a field of study I am not familiar with just to support my argument.
Originally Posted by Kadajko
@Bruh @spacehamster95
Tbh feminist theory AND evolunionary psychology are both pseudoscience.
They are both valid fields of study, with incredible achievements. Let's not dismiss them so easily.
