Originally Posted by Starlights
Originally Posted by Aishaddai
Originally Posted by sahardima
Originally Posted by Bufotenina
Yep but only as winter armor laugh

Summer version?:
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

:D:D:P

Ahhh the only way to play a wizard. You have good taste. 100 percent the wizard Mystra told Gale not to worry about. I would definitely main wizard if I had this in bg3 buffness and all.

Bah, if you can scroll up to @sahardima post and get the context, I understand the point/joke she was trying to make and it was good. But, even though I may enjoy male in sexy armor, this pic is off the chart. Seeing that bag of muscle chasing monsters in a speedo (is it chained speedo ?) is just ridiculous. But, I don't know, the few people here that has thrown the "fantasy world" card might like it I guess.
Originally Posted by Starlights
Originally Posted by Aishaddai
[quote=sahardima][quote=Bufotenina]Yep but only as winter armor laugh

Summer version?:
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

:D:D:P
Yup, it was a joke. Still, this sort of armor would be appealing for some people.

Originally Posted by Zarna
I think there should be multiple styles of armour for each type. Some can be "sexy" and some can be normal for both sexes. Also dyes, we have a framework for a crafting system and can collect herbs already. Each type of armour could have racial styles and also class styles. Something like Drow Cleric style for females I would expect to be "sexy" but some others I would expect to be practical. Ideally both sexes could wear whichever version they wished but that may be hard to add since the bodies are obviously shaped differently.

It will be a good compromise.

Last edited by sahardima; 10/01/21 08:57 AM.