Originally Posted by Sordak
However i argue that if you sexualize a man like you sexualize a woman, he wont be sexy but emasculated.

You are implying that there is something wrong with males having feminine featuires or having feminine armor available to males.

I think it can be done well and it doesn't look like a joke (atleast not more of a joke than some female armor):

[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]

Originally Posted by Sordak
Likewise if you sexualize a woman like a man, she would look vulgar and not sexy.

Like I mentioned previously you are allowed to account for difference in biology. If the male would be bare chested, just cover the chest.

[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]

Both types are fine.

Last edited by Kadajko; 14/01/21 11:04 AM.