Pathfinder is not popular at all, and while maybe you can argue it doesn't matter, it actually does. Sorry mate but this is a capitalist society, you wont see games you like develop more content and new games if they don't make popular and therefore successful money making games.
Yes it was. It was quite successful. They are currently making another one.
I think there's some irony in being excited about getting a new Baldur's Gate game but only if it abandons everything that would make it a Baldur's Gate game.
"Like, I want a new Baldur's Gate game, but turn-based games suck. Also, resting mechanics suck. Also, open worlds are cool. And they don't really need to bother with the story or the weird nonhuman races. Basically what I'm saying is that I'm excited for the new Baldur's Gate game but only if it's Assassins Creed."
(I know that's not what anyone's literally saying but lol.)
Actually the only mechanic I think should change is the rest to reset spells mechanic. Turn based should absolutely stay.
The open world comment I haven’t the faintest clue as to what you’re talking about. But the fact that there were more loading screens in the first 2 BG, was the limitations of the computers at the time, not because that’s what the game was about.
