So after many of us tried to explain you what the references to BG2 means (with exemples)... You're still stuck thinking lots of players just want a copy/paste ?
Considering what others say to understand their opinions and other points of view is usually constructive.
But it looks like your (wrong) "truth" is the only thing you consider.
Maybe that's why some called you "a troll".
You again.
I even used red text in another thread when someone said "graphics", implying a similar graphic style to BG2 that he expected in BG3 or somth like that, which is unlikely, given that it is a different engine and a different developer. I hope he didn't mean the quality of the graphics, right? Just did not specify, so we will assume that he was talking about the style when he wrote literally just "graphics are not like in BG2". Yea I think it's not fine. This is my opinion. I consider it a quibble.
And again my first post in this thread was not about this and I used this phrase as one example out of many. But you keep telling me off for saying that, seriously? Without even delving into what it was written for?
Are you kidding me? Now this thread is about me and some men who took my phrase out of context. Too cool for me.
The main idea of my first post was that BG3 is criticized more on forum than outside it. And not about what exactly criticize, I used an example that I personally think is the strangest. But this is not the main idea of my post, most of all I was interested in "where did you see more criticism than here???". That's what my post is about.
Do you understand now? And when you understand it, maybe you stop talking about it?
