So after many of us tried to explain you what the references to BG2 means (with exemples)... You're still stuck thinking lots of players just want a copy/paste ?
Considering what others say to understand their opinions and other points of view is usually constructive.
But it looks like your (wrong) "truth" is the only thing you consider.
Maybe that's why some called you "a troll".
You again.
I even used red text in another thread when someone said "graphics", implying a similar graphic style to BG2 that he expected in BG3 or somth like that, which is unlikely, given that it is a different engine and a different developer. I hope he didn't mean the quality of the graphics, right? Just did not specify, so we will assume that he was talking about the style when he wrote literally just "graphics are not like in BG2". Yea I think it's not fine. This is my opinion. I consider it a quibble.
And again my first post in this thread was not about this and I used this phrase as one example out of many. But you keep telling me off for saying that, seriously? Without even delving into what it was written for?
Are you kidding me? Now this thread is about me and some men who took my phrase out of context. Too cool for me.
The main idea of my first post was that BG3 is criticized more on forum than outside it. And not about what exactly criticize, I used an example that I personally think is the strangest. But this is not the main idea of my post, most of all I was interested in "where did you see more criticism than here???". That's what my post is about.
Do you understand now? And when you understand it, maybe you stop talking about it?
You again.
Ok now you have said you only meant graphics. Yes your logic does not make any sense to me do you understand?
You act like a FANBOY of DOS games and BG3.
Forums are here so people can give valuable feedback to the Baldurs Gate 3. I do like BG3 after all I gave it score 8.5/10 that said it is very uneven have great graphic, music, story, fairly ok combat. That said I could be much better!
Well so what if score on steam is very good now mostly? They do not even give a rating score in Steam.
It is in ALPHA? What people buy the game first? Those who likely like it most and can afford to pay the price.
What could be improved in BG3?
+ Voluntary unpause&pause the combat like that you can do in BG1 and BG2. I doubt they will do this though they would need to make some kind of AI to companions so they can a bit control themselves.
+ Make camera control and controlling better at best it average 3/5 the camera control.
+ Support for 1-6 player like BG1 and BG2... that would be more the 1-4. I doubt they will do this.
+ Make it a bit more like D&D rules.
+ Having in Early Access all classes in Players Handbook and all Cleric domains would be nice and if there are going to be more races for full release then to release them also.
+ Make Elves a bit more look like Elves.
+ Fix all bugs.
+ Add some good alignment characters hopefully at least in Act 2 and not only Evil or neutral characters more or less.
(((+ Nude women... when sex.) Ok this was not in BG1 and BG2 that is true.)))
You go over and over again saying it is only me that want to this when many what this (ok I do not know how many want nude women) . Yes I like this it is 8.5/10, but if you 10/10 if they would do all those thing for me. Finally if they do some of those (if not all then at least 4-5+ of them) then this game could be like 9/10 to me.
